CareerSteer – careers test for career choice                                               www.careersteer.org



        Organisations and Marketing Assignment: Summer 1997.
        
        
        Diploma in Careers Guidance, College of Guidance Studies, Swanley.
        
        Cole Davis
        
        "Managers  create and constantly adapt the organisation  so  that 
        the work is well done by people who are satisfied with what  they 
        have to do, so that they remain responsible and are able to adapt 
        well  to  the constantly changing circumstances  of  contemporary 
        working  life."    Analyse this statement and consider  how  this 
        applies   to   managers   within  a   guidance   or   educational 
        organisation. 
        
             "If  you're not in business for fun or profit what  the 
             hell are you doing here?"  (Townsend, 1970)
          
           Each phrase of the title statement may be agreed or  disagreed 
        with.   It  may  be demonstrated  that  successful  managers  are 
        actually moulded by the organisation's culture and that they  may 
        themselves  be  cast  out as ill-adapted  to  industrial  climate 
        changes.  Work performance may not necessarily be moulded in  the 
        rational   way  implied  by  'create'  and  'adapt'.    The   job 
        satisfaction,   motivation  and  flexibility  of   employees   is 
        dependent  upon  other factors as well as  managerial  attitudes.  
        Even  the  assumptions  of dramatic  change  may  be  overstated.   
        These  issues will be examined with reference to the way  careers 
        services are managed. 
        
           Whether or not managers are positive creators of organisations 
        depends  upon  the question of whether leaders are born  or  made 
        (Guest, 1987).  There is certainly much evidence to suggest  that 
        successful  leadership depends upon the interaction  of  personal 
        qualities  with  circumstances  (Lewin,  1952),  task  complexity 
        (Fiedler,  1978),  technology (Woodward, 1965)  and  the  culture 
        within  which work is embedded (Hofstede, 1980).  So in spite  of 
        such   notions   as   transformational   (versus   transactional) 
        leadership  (Burns, 1978), it could well be argued that  managers 
        are  created  and  adapted by organisations.   This  argument  is 
        supported by the poor prognosis for radical change being achieved 
        by  incumbent  chief  executives,  who tend  to  be  replaced  by 
        outsiders (Whittington, 1991).
        
           Managers'  ability  to  create and adapt  is  also  debatable.  
        March  and  Simon (1958) refer to bounded rationality.   "We  are 
        unable to consider more than a handful of factors, are biased  in 
        our interpretation of data and may satisfice" (Whittington, 1993) 
        rather  than  select  the  optimal  strategy.   Planning  may  be 
        circumscribed   by   broad   guidelines   (umbrella    strategy), 
        controlling the process of strategy formulation (Mintzberg, 1987) 
        or  by being single-minded about objectives (Argenti, 1993).   An 
        interpretative approach may try to avoid going against the  grain 
        of  organisational  cultures (Johnson, 1989;  Morgan,  G.,  1986; 
        Schein, 1985).  Alternatively, logical incrementalism may seek to 
        follow  up  general  aims with  opportunistic  responses  to  the 
        unexpected   (Quinn,   1980);  this  emphasises   consensus   and 
        commitment   in   order  to  maintain  links   between   strategy 
        formulation  and  implementation (Quinn,  1989).    
        
           A 'top-down' approach, however, - 'the manager creates' rather 
        than 'adapts' - is a questionable strategy.  When new  management 
        arrangements  in careers services include "crisp decision  making 
        by  the Board" and "clearer distinctions between  managerial  and 
        delivery  board" (Watson et al, 1995), it is not  too  surprising 
        that  participation in decision-making and  'collegiate  working' 
        are  variable  and  that careers advisers do  not  have  a  clear 
        understanding  of  strategic and operational  links  (Morris  and 
        Stoney, 1996).
 
           Adoption  of  empirical-rational,  normative-educational,   or 
        power-coercive change strategies (Chin and Benne, 1976) - winning 
        minds,  hearts  or  battles  -  may  depend  upon  organisational 
        assumptions of employees' motivation, akin to McGregor's Theories 
        X  and  Y  (1960).  Kotter and Schlesinger  (1979)  suggest  four 
        common  reasons for employees to resist change:  parochial  self-
        interest, misunderstanding / lack of trust, different assessments 
        and  a  low  tolerance  for change.  They  suggest  a  number  of 
        options, including education and communication, participation and 
        involvement, facilitation and support, negotiation and agreement, 
        manipulation and co-optation, and explicit and implicit coercion.  
        Strategy would be chosen according to speed, resistance, and  the 
        importance of the change (c.f. Lewin, 1951).
           
           One consideration in decision making is the importance of  job 
        satisfaction.   There  is  very  little  evidence  of  a   direct 
        relationship  between  job satisfaction and  performance  (Organ, 
        1991).    This  may  be  attributed  to  short-term   performance 
        measurement  as  criteria.   The problem,  however,  may  be  the  
        popular motivation theories which underpin many job  satisfaction 
        questionnaires.  These have major shortcomings.
        
           Maslow's  hierarchy of needs (Maslow, 1943) - too  famous  for 
        description  here  - assumes that a  person  requires  sufficient 
        satisfaction  of physical and relationship needs before  becoming 
        truly  creative.      Herzberg's 'Two Factor Theory'  (1966)  was 
        grounded  in an industrial theory "designed to test  the  concept 
        that  man has two sets of needs: his need as an animal  to  avoid 
        pain  and his need as a human to grow psychologically" (in  Pugh, 
        1990).  Hygiene factors, such as pay and conditions, were seen as 
        essentially animal needs, 'dissatisfiers' in their absence; areas 
        such as autonomy were the psychological 'motivators', giving rise 
        to  the  notion  of  job  satisfaction  as  a  key  to   improved 
        performance within the human relations movement.
        
           Arnold et al (1991) point to unpredictable groupings of needs; 
        it  is,  for  example,  quite possible to  find  people  who  are 
        respected  and creative in spite of a lack of  relationships.   A 
        similar diversity is seen in research on Herzberg's two  factors, 
        where  both  related to satisfaction and  dissatisfaction  (King, 
        1970;  Locke,  1976;  Miner and  Dachler,  1973).   Handy  (1985) 
        considers  a  more  fundamental  behavioural  criticism,  one  of 
        process:  "the research evidence does not support the  idea  that 
        needs become less powerful as they are satisfied".
        
           There  may  also,  however, be very valid -  if  difficult  to 
        measure  - indirect effects of job satisfaction.    Managers  may 
        therefore still see job satisfaction for their subordinates as to 
        their  own advantage.  In the short-term, greater  responsibility 
        and autonomy down the hierarchy may give more time to concentrate 
        on other matters.  A longer term view would examine the  benefits 
        of  better  group morale;  although Wall et al  (1986)  found  no 
        improvement  in  performance, the sheer  absence  of  subordinate 
        agitation may be a pleasant outcome for many managers.  
          
           That  such preoccupations may be essentially middle  class  is 
        suggested  by  the (1955) survey of Morse  and  Weiss.   Although 
        McGregor's (1960) Theory Y may be supported in terms of a general 
        desire to work even if it were unnecessary, manual workers wanted 
        to  do so on the grounds of pursuing an activity rather than  for 
        some form of achievement.  These findings were supported by those 
        of Goldthorpe et al (1968).  Herzberg therefore over-extended his 
        model  in  suggesting that 'hygiene-seeking' was a sign  of  poor 
        mental  health!  (Similarly, predictions of better mental  health 
        and  performance within autonomous workgroups were not  supported 
        by Wall et al [1986].)
        
           Regardless  of  the accuracy or otherwise of the  theories  of 
        Maslow and Herzberg, people probably feel more flattered by these 
        concepts  of  humanity than ones which portray  them  as  jealous 
        viewers  of others (equity theory); calculators of  complex  odds 
        (expectancy theory); part of a diagrammatic system of  influences 
        (goal-setting;  c.f.  Arnold  et al, 1991);  or  as  (relatively) 
        passive  organisms  influenced by past and  future  contingencies 
        (psychodynamic and learning theories).  
        
           Of the theories, goal-setting would seem to have the strongest 
        relationship  with performance (Locke et al, 1981,  1988).   Goal 
        setting  specifies (reasonable) goal difficulty, specificity  and 
        feedback.  This can be seen to have taken root in action plans as 
        well  as  in setting targets. With  the  'Thatcherite'  paradigm, 
        however, came Quality Assurance monitoring - a Theory X mechanism 
        if ever there was one.
        
          The previous paradigm shift of the 1960s and '70s probably  had 
        a  large  bearing on need theories'  continued  popularity.   The 
        recommendations  of Herzberg may and should be  respected  beyond 
        the  value  of  the  theory.   The  emergent  applications   from 
        understanding satisfiers and dissatisfiers have greatly  improved 
        the  well-being  of many workers.     Regardless  of  effects  on 
        industry, it is clearly in many individuals' perceived  interests 
        to have congenial work settings.  
        
           Congeniality  is  not a matter of  consensus,  however.   Most 
        careers advisers would agree with their learning organisation  on 
        the  need for skills development in a knowledge-based  occupation 
        and  few  dedicated professionals would work without pay  or  its 
        eventual  prospect.   They  may not, though,  share  the  current 
        managerial  enthusiasm  for  flattened  structures  (c.f.  Fayol, 
        1949),  as delayering presents fewer opportunities for  promotion 
        (Johnstone, 1998).  Fortunately for morale, careers services have 
        always had flat hierarchies (Law, 1996).
        
           If  job  satisfaction  is  sought  for  -  and  employers  may 
        appreciate  managers' efforts as signs of commitment even if  the 
        tasks  themselves do not satisfy - managers of  careers  services 
        have  plenty  to  consider.  Hackman and  Oldham  (1976)  defined 
        constructs  of job satisfaction as skill variety, task  identity, 
        task   significance,   autonomy  and   feedback.    
          
           Examples  of  interventions within careers services  may  mean 
        advisers   and   assistants  both   interviewing   and   visiting 
        opportunity  providers  (Morris and Stoney, 1996,  found  greater 
        specialisation  in careers companies); follow-up of  destinations 
        being  undertaken by those involved in interactions;  involvement 
        in  organisational  development  as it  impinges  upon  guidance; 
        prioritising  work,  including the ability to work at  home,  and 
        supportive  supervision on a regular basis (as opposed to  annual 
        appraisals).
        
           Job   satisfaction,   if  attained,  may  be   necessary   for 
        engendering responsibility, but may not be sufficient.  There  is 
        an  attitude  chasm between managers who view  workers  with  the 
        assumptions  of McGregor's Theory Y (1960), seeing  employees  as 
        naturally inclined to work and self-regulate, and those  assuming 
        Theory  X, that workers need cajoling and  monitoring.   Clearly, 
        managers   are  going  to  differ  in  their  attitudes   towards 
        empowerment,   the   meaning  of  which  differs   according   to 
        perception.
        
           Similarly,  employees may differ in their attitudes  to  being 
        empowered.   Not  all  individuals  will  be  motivated  by   the 
        intrinsic rewards of the job, some seeing work as more peripheral 
        to  their  lives.  Others, whilst seeing work as  important,  are 
        more  likely  to  identify  with  their  profession  than   their 
        organisation (Gouldner, 1957).
        
           Some may perceive a lack of equity in proceedings.     A sense 
        of  responsibility is more credible if the employee is  committed 
        to  the organisation.  This may mean emotional  (or  'affective') 
        attachment,  a  sharing of moral goals and a  perception  of  the 
        costs and risks associated with leaving (Allen and Meyer, 1990).
        
           Employee  commitment  may depend upon a  balance  between  the 
        expectations  of  employees and employer  (Argyris,  1964).   The 
        notion  of the 'psychological contract' (Herriot, 1987)  sums  up 
        the need for both sides to be explicit about their  expectations.  
        It   is  conceivable  that  without  explicit   negotiation   and 
        subsequent  agreements, expectations can become incompatible  and 
        resignation or poor performance will result.
        
           Whether or not such an ongoing contract is feasible - and this 
        could  be  part  of the agenda for appraisals -  there  are  some 
        actions which could improve mutual understanding at the onset  of 
        the  working relationship.  The job interview should include  the 
        passing on of meaningful information to the prospective employee, 
        as part of a two-way transaction (Herriot, 1987).  Similarly, the 
        induction   process  may  be  crucial  in   ensuring   successful 
        socialisation into the methods and culture of an organisation and 
        in making sense of new roles (Nicholson, 1984). 
        
           Being committed, well motivated and responsible, however, does 
        not  necessarily indicate adaptability.  Commitment may  militate 
        against  some  changes  and  may  indeed  alter  in  quality   as 
        individuals progress.  
          
           More  experienced  workers may take on a form  of  stewardship 
        (Arthur and Kram, 1989): managers must decide if such people  are 
        'deadwood' or the custodians of an organisation's culture.  Given 
        the effects of lost continuity after severe delayering and  down-
        sizing  in  some  companies,  perhaps  managers  should  consider 
        allocating  quality  assurance tasks  pertaining  to  traditional 
        company  values.   This could at times make a difference  to  the 
        usual alternative of re-training or dismissal.
        
           The  option of re-training assumes a need for change.   Whilst 
        not  contradicting  the  truism  that  all  things  must  change, 
        assumptions  of  permanent revolution, such  as  Charles  Handy's 
        Sigmoid  Curve (1995), persuade managers to transform  companies.  
        Workers   must  also  change,  becoming  portfolio   workers   in 
        management  literature  (Handy, 1991)  or  'flexible  employees'.
        
          Apart from requiring key skills, it is this writer's experience 
        that  most  employers  don't really want -  or  don't  utilise  - 
        polymaths.  Or does flexibility really mean the willingness to do 
        everything  required  at  once and at  any  time?      Hopefully, 
        careers   advisers  will  have  a  grasp  of  a  wide  range   of 
        occupational areas, and some business acumen, but not necessarily 
        because  they  will be doing a fundamentally different  job  from 
        hitherto.
        
           Even  assumptions of the external working  environment,  which 
        many writers describe as changing in a volatile manner, are  very 
        questionable.   Are we really becoming a nation of temporary  and 
        contract  workers?      (Permanent jobs are still very  much  the 
        norm  in  most occupations.) Will information  technology  change 
        whole economies? (Some analyses of industrial changes led by  the 
        Internet  amount  to  merely  channelling  advertising  and  some 
        business  transactions.)    Are globalised market forces  leading 
        to a new market structure?
        
           Kumar  (1997) deconstructs the overlapping  post-industrialist 
        theories  of  the  information society,  post-Fordism  and  post-
        modernism.    Small  often  interdependent  North  Italian   high 
        technology industries are often cited as examples of this.  These 
        may  not  be  indicative of industrial  sea  change;  outside  of 
        Umbrian   culture,   such  organisations  may   merely   form   a 
        counterpoint,  a reaction by companies trying to survive  in  the 
        face  of Leviathan.  
        
            As  still  dominant monoliths,  supermarkets  and  fast  food 
        chains demonstrate that Fordism still has the upper hand.   Niche 
        marketers  such  as the Sock, Tie and Body Shops are  forever  on 
        edge.    One  apparently  information-based  company,  Microsoft, 
        seems  to prefer to buy other companies rather than  innovate  in 
        any significant way.  Microsoft even breaks with the shibboleth
        of  market forces, with customers being constrained by  available 
        products  rather than being the arbiters of demand.  
        
           The  Windows  operating  system, as the  primary  example,  is 
        continually  refined to exclude external compatibility  and  thus 
        competition;  buyers do not necessarily like the latest  upgrade, 
        but are bound by the available software, which is itself produced 
        either by Microsoft or firms in thrall to the same phenomenon.

           Yet  such  assumptions of learning  organisations  and   post-
        Fordism  are the very stuff of labour market information  trends.  
        Guidance  workers  are  only  sure  of  the  uncertainty  of  the 
        postmodern society.
        
           Postmodernism seems in fact a reincarnation of older  analyses 
        of   the  present  -  which  only  seem  ludicrous   from   later 
        perspectives - fin de siecle, the end of history and  relativism.  
        The  Restoration of Charles II may well have  seemed  post-modern 
        after  the political and cultural upheavals of the civil war  and 
        Interregnum.    Trends  can rarely be recognised  as  significant 
        until they become to some extent historical: until they are, they 
        are part of contemporary life and a matter of uncertainty.
        
          Given  that  limits  to  planning  extend  beyond  the  bounded 
        rationality  of  managers (March and Simon,  1958),  encompassing 
        wider  uncertainties, choices of action are more fluid than  they 
        may  appear.   Whilst  regulated by  legislation  and  guided  by 
        professional practice, managers do not have to follow the smooth-
        tongued but often vicious dictates of the management theorists of 
        the  1980s.   Charles Handy, in the The  Empty  Raincoat  (1995), 
        acknowledges the distress that he had not expected in The Age  of 
        Unreason  (1991)  but fails to see the support that  he  and  his 
        colleagues  had  in  providing chic  for  Reaganomics,  with  the 
        delights of chaos theory and re-engineering.
        
           In the 1990s, some management theorists are recommending a new 
        relationship between managers and managed.  John Gilpin indicates 
        two ways of leading, command and control, and pacing and leading:
        
             "We  expect others to join us at our map of the  world, 
             do it as we do it and see things from our point of view 
             (or) we enter someone else's map of the world, where we 
             value  and respect their perspectives, create  rapport, 
             build  trust and then move them  imperceptibly  towards 
             another  way  of seeing things.   (The  1990s  require) 
             servant leaders .. serving the needs of others in order 
             to  attract willing volunteers on to one's own  pathway 
             to achievement and success.        "     (Trapp, 1998)
        
           This appears to be a blend of logical incrementalism, with its 
        quest  for  consensus,  and people-centred as  opposed  to  task-
        centred  leadership  (Fiedler,  1978).   It  is  one  of  several 
        attempts  by  management theorists to predict or promote  a  more 
        caring management in the 1990s.  Whether or not this would be any 
        different  from  the 'human relations' school  of  organisational 
        development is a moot point, but it would appear that choices are 
        possible.
        
           These are moral choices.  Organisations have more than one way 
        of  viewing  themselves; to many, they would often seem  to  have 
        adopted  the  metaphor of the prison  (Morgan,  1986).   Although 
        bound with their own traditions as careers services and absorbing 
        commercial  values, the new careers companies are left with  some 
        leeway  as  to  how to provide leadership and  to  empower  their 
        staff.  
        


                                  REFERENCES
        
        
        Allen,  N.  J.  and Meyer, J. P.,  (1990)   The  measurement  and 
        antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to 
        the organization.  Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-8.
        
        Argenti,   J.  (1993)   Your  Organization:  What  is   it   for?  
        Maidenhead, Berkshire: McGraw-Hill.
        
        Argyris,   C.   (1964)   Integrating  the  Individual   and   the 
        Organization.  N.Y.: Wiley.
        
        Arnold,  J.,  Robertson,  I.T. and Cooper,  C.  L.  (1991)   Work    
        Psychology:  Understanding  human  behaviour  in  the  workplace,    
        London: Pitman 
        
        Arthur,  M. B. and Kram, K. E. (1989)  Reciprocity at  work:  the 
        separate,  yet  inseparable  possibilities  for  individual   and 
        organisational  development.  In Arthur, M. B., Hall, D.  T.  and 
        Lawrence,  B.  S. (eds.) Handbook of Career  Theory.   Cambridge: 
        Cambridge University Press.
        
        Burns, J. M. (1978) Leadership.  N.Y.: Harper and Row.
        
        Chin, R. and Benne, K. D. (1976) General Strategies for Effecting 
        Change  in  Human Systems.  In Bennis, W. G., Benne,  K.  D.  and 
        Chin,  R.  (eds.) The Planning of Change, 4th.  ed.  N.Y.:  Holt, 
        Rinehart & Winston.
        
        Gouldner,  A.  W. (1957)  Cosmopolitans and  locals:  towards  an 
        analysis   of  latent  social  roles.    Administrative   Science 
        Quarterly, 2, 282-292.
        
        Guest,  D.  (1987) Leadership and Management. In Warr,  P.  (ed.) 
        Psychology at Work.  3rd. ed.  Harmondsworth: Penguin.
        
        Fayol, H. (1949)  General and Industrial Management.  Pitman.
        
        Fiedler,  F. E. (1978) The contingency model and the dynamics  of 
        the  leadership  process.   In Berkowicz, L.  (ed.)  Advances  in 
        Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 11.  N.Y.: Academic Press.
        
        Goldthorpe,  J.  H., Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F.  and  Platt,  J.    
        (1968)  The  Affluent  Worker   Cambridge:  Cambridge  University    
        Press.
        
        Hackman,  J. R. and Oldham, G. R. (1976)  Motivation through  the 
        design  of work: Test of a theory.  Organizational  Behavior  and 
        Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
        
        Handy, C. (1985)  Understanding Organizations.  London: Penguin.
        
        Handy, C. (1991)  The Age of Unreason.  London: Arrow.
        
        Handy, C. (1995)  The Empty Raincoat.  Sidney, Australia: Arrow.
        
        Herriot, P. (1987)  The selection interview.  In Warr, P.B. (ed.) 
        Psychology at Work (3rd. edition).  Harmondsworth: Penguin.
        
        Herzberg, F. (1966)  Work and the Nature of Man  Cleveland, Ohio:    
        World Publishing 
        
        Hofstede,   G.  (1980).  Culture's  Consequences:   International 
        Differences  in  Work-Related Values.   Beverley  Hills,  Calif.: 
        Sage.
        
        Johnson,  G. (1989) Rethinking Incrementalism.  In Asch,  D.  and 
        Bowman, C. (eds.) Readings in Strategic Management.  Basingstoke: 
        MacMillan Press.
        
        Johnstone,  V. (1998)  Ambitious managers keep close eye  on  the 
        rankings.  Daily Telegraph, Thursday April 23rd.
        
        King,  N. (1970)  Clarification and evaluation of the  two-factor    
        theory of job satisfaction.  Psychology Bulletin, 74, 18-31.
        
        Kotter, J. and Schlesinger, L. A. (1979) Choosing Strategies  for 
        Change.  Harvard Business Review, 57, March-April, 2, 106-14.
        
        Kumar,  K. (1997)  From Post-industrial to  Post-modern  Society.  
        Oxford: Blackwell.
        
        Law,  B. (1996)  Developing careers programmes in  organisations.  
        In Watts, A.G., Law, B., Killeen, J, Kidd, J.M. and Hawthorn,  R.  
        Rethinking careers education and guidance.  London: Routledge.
        
        Lewin, K. (1951)  Field Theory and Social Change.  NY: Harper and 
        Row.
        
        Lewin, K. (1952)  Group decisions and social change.  In Swanson, 
        G.  E.,  Newcomb. T. M. and Hartley, E. L.  (eds.)   Readings  in 
        Social Psychology (2nd. edn.).  N.Y.: Holt.
        
        Locke,  E. A. (1976)  The nature and causes of job  satisfaction.     
        In   Dunnette,   M.   D.  (ed)   Handbook   of   industrial   and    
        organizational    Psychology  Chicago: Rand McNally.
        
        Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M. and Latham, G. P.  (1981) 
        Goal  setting  and  task  performance  1969-1980.   Psychological 
        Bulletin, 90, 125-152.
        
        Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P. and Erez, M. (1988) The  determinants 
        of goal commitment.  Academy of Management Review, 13, 23-39.
        
        March, J. G. and Simon, H. A. (1958) Organisations.  NY: Wiley.
        
        Maslow,  A. (1943) A theory of motivation. Psychological  Review, 
        50, 370-396.
        
        McGregor,  D. (1960)  The Human Side of Enterprise.  NY:  McGraw-
        Hill.
        
        Miner,  J. B. and Dachler, H. P. (1973)  Personnel attitudes  and    
        motivation.  Annual Review of Psychology, 24, 379-422.

        Mintzberg,  H.  (1987)   Crafting  strategy.   Harvard   Business 
        Review.  July-August, 66-75.
        
        Morgan, G. (1986)  Images Of Organization.  London: Sage.
        
        Morris, M. and Stoney, S. (1996) An Evaluation of the Performance 
        of Pathfinder Careers Services.  NFER.
        
        Morse, N. and Weiss, R. (1955)  The function and meaning of  work    
        and the job.  American Sociological Review.
        
        Nicholson,  N.  (1984)   A  theory  of  work  role   transitions.  
        Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 172-191.
        
        Organ,  D. (1991)  A restatement of the  satisfaction-performance 
        hypothesis.   In Steers, R. and Porter, L. (eds.) Motivation  and 
        Work Behavior.  NY: McGraw-Hill.
        
        Pugh, D. S. (ed)  (1990)  Organization Theory  London: Penguin.
        
        Quinn,   J.   B.   (1980)   Strategies   for   Change:    Logical 
        Incrementalism.  Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin.
        
        Quinn, J. B. (1989)  Managing Strategic Change.  In Asch, D.  and 
        Bowman, C. (eds.) Readings in Strategic Management.  Basingstoke: 
        MacMillan Press.
        
        Schein,  E.  (1985) Organizational Culture and  Leadership.   San 
        Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
        
        Townsend, R. (1970)  Up The Organization.  London: Hodder.
        
        Trapp, R. (1998)  The art of leading from behind.  Independent on 
        Sunday, May 17th.
        
        Wall, T. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, F. R. and Clegg, C. W.  (1986)     
        Outcomes   of   autonomous   workgroups:  a   long   term   field    
        experiment.  Academy of Management Journal, 29, 280-304.
        
        Watson,  A.,  Stuart,  N. and Lucas, D.  (1995)   Impact  of  New 
        Management Arrangements in Pathfinder Careers Service.  DfEE.
        
        Whittington,  R. (1991)  Recession strategies and top  management 
        change.  Journal of General Management, 16, 3, 11-28.
        
        Whittington,  R.  (1993)  What is Strategy and  does  it  matter?  
        London: International Thomson Business Press.
        
        Woodward,   J.  (1965)   Industrial  Organization:   Theory   and 
        Practice.  Oxford: Oxford University Press.
        

 

CareerSteer – careers test for career choice                                               www.careersteer.org